If MLB Really Wanted To Speed Up Baseball…

MLB About To Introduce Two Ridiculous Rule Changes To “Speed Up” The Game.

Why The Changes Are Bad And What They Should Do Instead.

These fans watching baseball in the 1940s don’t look bored at all. That may be because the average length of a 9 inning baseball game in the 1940s was about 2 hours and 15 minutes.

Baseball is a slow and boring sport. The games are too long. There is not enough scoring.

These are some of the complaints that have been lodged against the National Pastime.

The only part I’ll agree with is that the games are definitely too long.

MLB executives and the players union are trying out two changes this year in the minor leagues to  speed up the game. After trial periods, it is likely these changes will be permanently adapted in the major leagues. They may indeed speed up games by a few seconds. For the vast majority of games these changes will have little effect and do more damage than good to the overall structure of baseball.

There are other changes that would be more practical and easy to implement to dramatically shorten all games without changing baseball itself. I’ll discuss that after we review the two proposed MLB rule changes.

The first proposed rule change is that a team will be able to declare an intentional walk without the pitcher throwing any pitches. The pitcher’s manager will just signal for an intentional walk and the batter will go to first.

The second rule change is even sillier. In extra inning games, starting in the tenth inning each team when they come to bat will start the inning with a man already on second base.

So why are these changes beyond foolish?

Let’s look at the first proposal, the announced intentional walk. Although it sounds like an easy strategy to walk a batter intentionally, it is sometimes not so simple to throw four balls that are nowhere near home plate.

There are pitchers, such as the Yankees Dellin Betances, who when called upon to execute an intentional walk, every ball they throw can be an adventure. A wild pitch is always a possibility. Lobbing the ball to the catcher is hard for some pitchers. There are also quite a number of pitchers who throw the ball too close to the plate, so the batter can swing at the ball. Every now and then you’ll see something that you rarely see. Here are just two recent examples.

Miguel Cabrera drives in a run on an intended intentional walk.

Gary Sanchez of the Yankees nearly hits a home run on a pitch that was meant to be a ball.

As I pointed out many pitchers really have a hard time throwing a ball intentionally outside of the strike zone when the situation is called for. This is far more common than you might imagine. Wild pitches can change the outcome of a ballgame, especially with runners on base as seen here in multiple cases:

Then there is the opposite effect, where the defense pulls a tricky play.

In the early 1970s I recall seeing Reds superstar Johnny Bench get fooled at the plate. It happened on the biggest stage possible; game three of the 1972 World Series.

Bench had a 3 and 2 count when A’s manager Dick Williams paid a visit to the mound. Williams talked with pitcher Rollie Fingers and catcher Gene Tenace and made it seem like Williams told Fingers to intentionally walk the dangerous slugger. Because as Tenace returned to the plate to await the next pitch from Fingers, Tenace, stood up, put his hand out calling for an intentional ball four.

And guess what? Tenace jumped right back behind the plate and Fingers threw a slider for strike three, stunning Bench and everyone watching. It was a deft move you don’t see very often.

I couldn’t believe that I found the moment on YouTube.

In 1996 Dennis Martinez and Tony Pena of the Indians, successfully pulled the same move on Blue Jays star John Olerud.

It’s true, these flubs are extremely rare, but they do occur. The automatic intentional walk is a shortsighted rule change and ends up removing strategy from the game.

One other thing: how does the new rule go down in the record books? Will the pitcher be credited with four pitches thrown? What happens when you are at three balls and one strike, do you just declare the walk when you want to intentionally pass a batter or does the pitcher still have to throw a pitch?

The second rule change of starting the inning of an extra inning game with a man placed on second base to begin the inning is simply ludicrous.

No nail-biters anymore, no strategy – it’s just get this game over with. This is what MLB is saying.

Joe Torre, MLB’s Chief Baseball Officer, is in favor of bringing the rule to the major leagues if the minor league experiment works.

Torre said, “Let’s see what it looks like. It’s not fun to watch when you go through your whole pitching staff and wind up bringing a utility infielder in to pitch. As much as it’s nice to talk about being at an 18-inning game, it takes time.”

Really Joe? How many games went to 18 innings or more in the past ten years? How many times did a manager use their whole pitching staff?

In the entire history of Major League Baseball there have only been 46 games that have gone more than 19 innings. On average less than 10 games per year last 15 innings or more. If a manager goes through his entire pitching staff, well he’s not a good manager. Believe it or not many fans enjoy marathon games. It’s the time of those exciting games that gets people sleepy, not the number of innings.

If you want to ruin baseball then this rule change is perfect.

By the way: how would the scoring work for putting a runner on second? Idiotically.

The pitcher didn’t allow the runner on, so why penalize him and the team when a ground ball to second for an out advancing the runner to third and then a fly ball can result in a run. The pitcher and the team was essentially defensively effective, but could lose the game.

This rule is MLB being lazy and coming up with a dumb solution just to shorten games and appeal to younger fans with limited attention spans. It’s like MLB took a page out of the NHL rule book with hockey’s overtime shootout to decide tie games. That adjustment has been horrible for hockey and its fans.

Now what are the ways to speed up baseball games significantly?

Change # 1 – Enforce rule 5.07 (c) of the Major League Baseball rule book which states:
“When the bases are unoccupied, the pitcher shall deliver the ball to the batter within 12 seconds after he receives the ball. Each time the pitcher delays the game by violating this rule, the umpire shall call “Ball.”

The 12-second timing starts when the pitcher is in possession of the ball and the batter is in the box, alert to the pitcher. The timing stops when the pitcher releases the ball. The intent of this rule is to avoid unnecessary delays. The umpire shall insist that the catcher return the ball promptly to the pitcher, and that the pitcher take his position on the rubber promptly. Obvious delay by the pitcher should instantly be penalized by the umpire.

Did you realize rule 6.02a (8) says:

If there is a runner, or runners, it is a balk when: The pitcher unnecessarily delays the game;

Have you ever seen that enforced? I haven’t. But I’ve seen pitchers call the catcher to the mound six separate times for one batter or take over 30 seconds between each and every pitch.

I’ve noticed and counted the time between pitches in many games. Most pitchers take between 22 -27 seconds to throw a pitch after receiving the ball back from the catcher. Some pitchers are agonizingly slow, like the Dodgers Pedro Baez (over 30 seconds between pitches) and Kenley Jansen (27 seconds between pitches). There are many hurlers who can transform their own fielders into a trance-like state with all that inactivity.

There’s no excuse for this. Watch R.A. Dickey or Mark Buehrle pitch and the game moves at a brisk pace. Unfortunately they are the exceptions. Most pitchers take wayyyyy too long between pitches. Put up a pitch clock and give the pitchers a little leeway- 15 seconds and have them throw the pitch or call it a ball. Figure saving at least 5  seconds per pitch with 260 total pitches being thrown. total time shortened per game: minimum 26 minutes

Change #2 – This rule goes hand in hand with the pitchers delays. Stop batters from stepping out of the box unless they have something in their eye, have broken a bat or some other real reason. No stepping out for adjusting your crotch; re-wrapping your batting gloves between every pitch; or calling time for the hell of it. Call a strike automatically if the batter steps out of the box. Watch an old baseball game from before 1975. Almost no one stepped out of the box once they were in it. Enforce the rule that is on the books 5.04 (b) (2) which says:

“Once a batter has taken his position in the batter’s box, he shall not be permitted to step out of the batter’s box in order to use the resin or the pine tar rag, unless there is a delay in the game action or, in the judgment of the umpires, weather conditions warrant an exception.”

5.04 (b) (3) “If the batter refuses to take his position in the batter’s box during his time at bat, the umpire shall call a strike on the batter. The ball is dead, and no runners may advance. After the penalty, the batter may take his proper position and the regular ball and strike count shall continue. If the batter does not take his proper position before three strikes have been called, the batter shall be declared out.”

total time shortened per game: works in conjunction with pitchers shortening pitch time

Change #3- Cut back the number of warm up pitches in between innings. The poor little modern pitchers are so concerned with their fragile arms why the heck are they throwing a minimum of 7 pitches in between innings? Over six innings that’s at  least 42 pitches on those million dollar arms. They’ve warmed up before the game and they’ve pitched. How about 2 or 3 practice pitches and let’s play ball. total time shortened per game: minimum 4 minutes

Change #4 – Don’t have the TV commercial time between innings reflect the actual time there is no action on the field. Keep the two minutes of commercials. Let the players start playing within a minute and a half of switching sides. What’s the most the viewing audience would miss? Two pitches? But what if something happens? In this day and age of DVRs and TiVo people fast forward through the commercials. The teams broadcasting can quickly recap and replay what the TV audience missed. Usually it will be nothing. With pitching changes there are more breaks than just 18 changes between innings total time shortened per game: minimum 9 minutes

There you have it baseball can shorten its games by about 40 minutes by instituting these changes. But they won’t. They’ll come up with more bad ideas. With its declining popularity and aging audience baseball will soon be the National Past Time.

9 thoughts on “If MLB Really Wanted To Speed Up Baseball…

  1. Jake

    Speeding up the pitching won’t make the game better. With the other major sports gaining popularity I feel as if the MLB is rushing to conclusions. I understand that they believe that the amount of viewers will increase and that making the games speed up will increase the interest of the younger audiences. Like stated here I also believe that there are other ways to change the game besides speeding up the pitching. Making smaller subtler changes to the game would be fine but speeding up the pitchers also speeds up the batters which is changing the whole reason we, the fans of the game love the game. (https://www.breezejmu.org/sports/should-mlb-implement-rule-changes-to-speed-up-the-game/article_42bd7c88-22f4-11e7-b672-9f4c001f128e.html). The MLB is a business and all businesses need to make money and increasing the viewers will increase revenue, but how can we be sure that speeding up the game by changing the gameplay of the players will increase the views and not decrease them? There’s still the chance that longtime fans of baseball aren’t going to want watch the game they love change because of something that isn’t beneficial for gameplay but views and attendance. I do agree that over the years the game has slowed down and some of the changes are necessary like stated in this article (http://deadline.com/2018/02/major-league-baseball-rules-changes-speed-up-games-1202295257/) the important changes are the changes that don’t effect the game as directly like decreasing time before innings, it’ll make for less commercial revenue but could increase the viewers at home because of less channel switching during breaks and them eventually not returning.
    Something that I feel is not addressed when talking about views and ratings is that when the players get better in baseball less action occurs. As the pitchers become better, batters hit less pitches and as defenders get better, more plays become routine. Sure as batters become better hitters they can hit more home runs and try to find more gaps which is what people want to see but the batters can’t just hit any ball exactly where they want it, it depends on the defense and pitch placement. But the more pitches the batters see, the more chances of them actually hitting the ball and wearing out the pitcher all things that regardless of pitching times and speeding up time between innings will always be a part of the game and these things take time. Eight to twelve pitch at bats make the game interesting, “who is going to win the battle?”, “can he sit him down and end the inning?” these are things that make the game interesting, speeding up all the non-gameplay oriented aspects can help the game but changing the way pitchers pitch is not one of them.

  2. Kevin

    Baseball has been around for who really know’s how long… Baseball was certainly not invented to be formatted for American TV broadcasting in 2017!! Baseball will outlast TV! The same way the Beatles Music has outlasted circular Records and the phonograph!

    Don’t change baseball rules to accommodate formatted TV broadcasting’s… Baseball should consider other avenues i.e. streaming baseball games on the computer or your phone, or some other device, etc…
    Like newspapers, TV also is going away in our lifetimes. Baseball has outlasted Newspapers and will outlast TV as well. Thank you! Have a nice day!

    1. Stewart Anstead

      I know this was written a while ago, but it makes sense to enforce the rules on pace of play. According to the New York Times, the intentional walk only occurs every .2 games per team. That means that the new automatic intentional walk saves less than 1 minute every other game. In other words, the rule change has no affect on the speed of the game at all.

      Where I differ from the author is that I think the intentional walk is horrible from a business sense. The best hitters are the ones who are walked in that manner. They are often the draw for attendance and for tuning in to watch a game. Intentional walks take the bat out of the hands of the reason most people watch a game for … to see the best hitters do what they do best. What that means is, 40% of the time, there will be an audience who is cheated out of their chance to see the most exciting part of a game. There is no equivalent to this in any other pro sport. It makes zero sense to allow the managers of another team to arbitrarily pull the bat out of the hands of the games’ best Marketing tools.
      Intentional walks are ALWAYS an option. Make the pitching team take the risk of not throwing strikes. That’s where the risk of a flub is at its best anyway.
      I feel strongly about baseball being in survival mode right now. I heard that half a billion dollar contracts are coming, as well as a lockout because of them. I hope for good things in baseball. It would be sad for greed on both sides to ruin rather good thing we have. Let’s not add more obstacles in the way of fans to enjoy the best game on the earth.

    2. Matt Turpin

      They are not saying to shorten the game to accommodate TV. The point is that the game has gotten too long. (Redoing the batting gloves after every pitch – come on!). The game is longer now than when Nolan Ryan, Pete Rose, Mickey Mantle, Joe DiMaggio, or Ty Cobb played. It’s as long as it has ever been. It seems like MLB has instructed the umps to ignore their own rules to extend the game.

  3. David F.

    One more thing…the League doesn’t really want to shorten the games. It is making such a show of concern here (while not actually doing anything productive) merely to appease the complaining fans. Like the NFL, most of the MLB’s money comes from advertising. The longer the games go, the more ads get played and the more money the League makes. So the fight to shorten the games is actually a lot more of an uphill battle than just rule enforcement. It is a change which would require fundamental changes in the way baseball is financed. And that just is not going to happen.

  4. David F.

    Great article.
    The MLB’s new rules will do exactly what you say…further the decline of baseball in America.
    Your suggestions #1 and #2 are right on target and illustrate the consequences of having rules without enforcement behind them…a problem which is occurring not just with baseball, but throughout modern American culture with similar consequences.

    The best thing about your suggestions is that they don’t require any action from the Commissioner or the League itself. All that it would take is for umpires to enforce the rules that already exist. You know…to do their jobs.

  5. Tony Padilla

    My comment is not about this article its about your site Its the best site Ive came across in along time so many cool articles i just hope the good lord lets me live long enough to read all the articles because I find even the articles on subjects i really dont give a shit about fasinating but I suppose thats why its called stuffnobodycaresabout plus it does sound alot more classy then stuffnodygivesashitabout If it was up to me your site would be called stuffnobodycaresaboutbutcoolashelltolearnabout


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.